April 24 2014 Latest news:

A partnership between three councils whose headquarters are about 100 miles apart is likely to be agreed this week.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Breckland Council has had shared a chief executive with South Holland District Council - which is based in Spalding - since August 2010 and they have had joint senior managers since last April.

Great Yarmouth Borough Council now wants to create a three-way partnership.

On Wednesday, Thursday and Friday respectively, South Holland, Yarmouth and Breckland will hold special full council meetings to approve the principle of the partnership and have consultation with unions and staff.

Terry Huggins - currently chief executive of Breckland and South Holland - is likely to head all three authorities during the implementation period and a long-term appointment would then have to be made.

There have been concerns about the distance between the three authorities - and the prospect of journey which could have to be made between Yarmouth and Spalding along the A47 and A17.

But in a report to this week’s meetings, Mr Huggins said: “Working with a shared management team required officers and members to be flexible in developing new ways of working. Use of video conferencing and other communications methods will be used to avoid unnecessary travelling.”

The report reveals pay bands for the new structure with the chief executive earning between £100,879 and £124,004, the deputy chief executive and directors on £82,064-£100,879, assistant directors on £54,311-£66,763 and heads of service earning between £46,115 and £54,311.

No details have been revealed about the specific number of posts which would be lost but in the report, total redundancy costs are estimated at £240,000 (plus £76,000 if Mr Huggins is made redundant). There are projected savings of about £333,000 per year in staff costs.

The councils would remain independent and staff below senior management would remain with one authority.

Gary Porter, Leader of South Holland District Council, said: “This is a ground-breaking project which will see financial savings, the sharing of skills and the creation of greater resilience across three authorities.”

6 comments

  • What a relief to read that "The councils would remain independent and staff below senior management would remain with one authority."! I find it hard to believe that a scheme of such complexity is taking shape -- and is seeing so little public discussion or consultation -- while the various unitary government options for Norfolk do not seem to be up for discussion at all.

    Report this comment

    Trevor Ashwin

    Monday, March 5, 2012

  • What a looney tunes idea.Complete and utter madness.

    Report this comment

    wes1975

    Monday, March 5, 2012

  • Let's put the knife in to the proposals for a Unitary authority while joining hands behind our backs. The economies of scale will only go so far and this makes very little sense.

    Report this comment

    JCW

    Monday, March 5, 2012

  • Has anybody aske the council tax payers of Great Yarmouth, Gorleston, Belton & Bradwell if they want to be unified with Breckland & South Holland. I do not think so. I can not see this saving money because the councillars will have an excuse to put in for higher expenses when the hold meeting in the areas. It is about time the Tax Payers are consulted

    Report this comment

    Dave

    Monday, March 5, 2012

  • "The report reveals pay bands for the new structure with the chief executive earning between £100,879 and £124,004," Thats cheaper than what Packham is on at present.

    Report this comment

    "V"

    Monday, March 5, 2012

  • (I tried to post a comment here earlier but failed -- so my apologies if my original comment 'turns up') I am astonished that District Councils whose territories do not even join with each others seem to be hard at work on complex schemes like this, with very little public discussion or consultation. Surely the various unitary schemes that have been proposed for Norfolk should be considered too if there is a need to make savings in this way? Some of them may be more logical -- and easier for all of us to understand!

    Report this comment

    Trevor Ashwin

    Monday, March 5, 2012

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Homes24
Jobs24
Drive24
MyDate24
MyPhotos24
FamilyNotices24
Weddingsite

loading...
Click here to read more of our digital publications

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT