Guestwick windfarm bid 'not dropped yet'
Energy firm Enertrag has said it is not dropping its plans for a wind farm in north Norfolk despite the scheme being effectively thrown out by the high court.
Energy firm Enertrag this week remained defiant about its plans for a wind farm despite the scheme being effectively thrown out by the high court.
The company wanted to put six wind turbines up to 125m high on land at Guestwick.
But a high court judge has ruled that, although it was a finely-balanced decision, the considerable rural charm of the area, including the presence of two listed buildings, was reason enough to refuse the plans for turbines there.
The court challenge was brought by Enertrag over a planning inspector's decision to dismiss an appeal against refusal of planning consent by Broadland Council in 2005.
David Linley, manager of projects for Enertrag, said: "We are not disappointed - we knew it was a marginal challenge. The most import-ant thing is the inspector in the last inquiry said it
was a very finely-balanced situation, which means if we could improve the situation it might tip the scales.
- 1 Repair work set to get under way at 'carbuncle' property
- 2 Host of Fakenham Jubilee events revealed
- 3 Dentist staff working round the clock to address 'enforcement action'
- 4 'It's scary' - foodbank volunteers lift lid on cost of living crisis
- 5 Fakenham swimming pool plans - Everything you need to know
- 6 'An iron man in a wooden boat' - Tribute paid to legendary coxswain
- 7 Dog and group cut off by tide saved after being spotted waist-high in water
- 8 Plans for new Fakenham swimming pool and sports pitch revealed
- 9 Council set to sell mobile home site
- 10 Holkham pub closes to drinkers to become hotel and restaurant
"As far as we are concerned it is not dead until we decide it is. We are seeing if it is possible to improve the scheme."
The wind farm scheme was first announced in 2003, but opponents raised some �50,000 locally to fight it.
Robin Back, chairman of Guestwick parish meeting, which has represented other villages in the area, said he felt the principles on which the application had been thrown out would be difficult to overcome, as these were based on the landscape of the area and mention of listed buildings.
But he said Enertrag, as a private developer, was free to submit a new scheme.
"Whether they put in another application or not is up to them," he said. "If and when they do we will address it accordingly."
Mr Back thought it would be difficult to see how the issues raised by the high court could be challenged unless the government decided to change the rules or legislation.
"The law as it stands at the moment has been proved to work," he added.